Trans & "Far Right": The War on Free Speech Just Exploded

The 5-Step Authoritarian Plan from Lying Elites is (Almost) Impossible to Stop

Did you know that the BBC has breached guidelines over the Israel-Hamas War?

Doing so once or twice would be unjust and merit a public apology and a commitment to do better in future. To do so 5-10 times, however, shows inherent bias. It would raise questions of an agenda at the top and explain how we end up with such outrageous Christmas turkeys as Queers for Palestine.

Now, imagine if the BBC were found to have made such a breach not once or twice…not 5-10 times, but 100 times in less than one year?

They'd be taken off the air immediately, you’d expect, while an investigation was carried out into deliberate bias, negligence, and deception at the heart of the world's most trusted media source.

But the BBC didn't breach guidelines 100 times.

The actual number is 1,500.

That is fucking bonkers.

The Telegraph’s Investigation

The hypocrisy is not just infuriating but…fascinating. At least, it’s astounding that they have the chutzpah, given legacy media elites and politicians have been calling for the arrest of influencers for online disinformation.

Pavel Durov, the owner of the Telegram communications app, has just been arrested not for disinformation but for facilitating an app that allowed unfettered and unmonitored speech and refusing to cooperate with authorities. Others have been locked up for years for offensive social media posts.

Now that a report by The Telegraph has found the BBC was "heavily biased against Israel", what do we do with the BBC's director general Tim Davie? Should we not expect to see Davie led out in cuffs, followed by Gary Lineker, Ian Hislop and Huw Edwards?

The latter has avoided seeing the inside of a cell despite pleading guilty to child sexual abuse image charges. Perhaps Starmer's speech stormers will take his disinformation more seriously!

The deception is not an exception at the BBC—it's the norm. Despite all evidence to the contrary, its commentators and pundits regularly referred to the women-beating Olympic champion Imane Khelif as a woman. I invited developmental biologist Dr Emma Hilton on my show to make sure I got this right—and she is in no doubt about Khelif's male status.

Why has the BBC not done the same?

Why, too, has the BBC continued to use female pronouns for male rapists?

Why has it exaggerated claims of Far-Right protests?

I was watching one such report that demonised the 'Far-Right' and then portrayed a masked Islamist mob armed with bats and knives as "defending themselves". When these innocent masked men surrounded the female Sky News host, she had to go off the air. It had echoes of CBS News reporter Lara Logan, who was violently gang raped in Egypt by the very people with whom she’d been celebrating “freedom”…after her camera went off.

Last night, I watched clips of Stacey Dooley's investigation into Islam in Luton. It occurred to me that this was 12 years ago - the last time the BBC was honest about these issues. The combination of the growing tide of Islam and the sacredness of identity has meant blasphemy laws now stifle our news teams. This is just one of the many reasons that we need social media indies, even with our faults.

Stacey Dooley Was The Last Honest Person at the BBC

One of the hardest parts of being an alternative writer and YouTuber is that I have to use titles and captions that grab attention. I don't have the financial backing of massive institutions. In fact, my channel barely turns a profit.

Big titles keep the lights on.

I'm proud of my channel. It draws significantly higher numbers on YouTube than BBC Three and legacy podcasters, such as The News Agents (Emily Maitlis). It convinces minds and alerts people to the lies at the heart of our media landscape.

But I'm also aware of how some of my titles and topics must seem to those who have yet to question their reality. Even the end of that sentence has me sounding like a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist.

This means that we, as alternative indies, have to work harder to convince people, whereas those associated with the BBC fall back on their status.

Here’s Why That Status Is Now Deceptive

I was scrolling through X last night when I spotted a post that encapsulates the deliberate lies of the elite so perfectly that it should be framed. Scottish former first minister Humza Yousaf - the one who went on a racist anti-white rant while in power - was congratulating the people of Glasgow for turning up in huge numbers at yet another "anti-racist" rally (the kind where they call to cut the throats of Zionists).

Humza Yousaf: Malice or Stupidity?

How is it that the political and media elite has been able to simultaneously squawk about the rise of the Far Right and gloat about the lack of the Far Right?

Here's the 5-step plan for how Humza Yousaf and woke authoritarians lie to us in the most Orwellian manner:

Step 1:

Scaremonger the public by incepting the idea that the Far-Right bogeyman is so vast and powerful that it is taking over the country. Despite little evidence of a large Far-Right, speak of it as though fact and use this fear to bring in new hate speech laws that prevent alternative media sources (such as me) from telling the truth.

Step 2:

Find your Voldemort.

Make them believe Tommy Robinson is conducting an orchestra of fascism from his sunbed. Incept the idea that the Antifa rallies are “mostly peaceful” counter-protests (forget the thousands calling for the death of Jews).

Step 3:

When the Far-Right invariably doesn't turn up in numbers to protest (because it hardly exists), GLOAT about how small the Far-Right is, as though its smallness is somehow a direct result of your righteousness rather than because you lied about its vastness.

Step 4:

Repeat steps 1-3 until the public is hypnotised into voting to curb free speech and take down dissenting voices. This has the added benefit of enabling you to expedite mass immigration policies as short-term solutions for the crumbling economy. Anyone who pushes back is deemed Far-Right, and nobody wants that association.

Step 5:

Celebrate in a champagne-filled swimming pool with legacy media moguls and world leaders.

For history, see my article about the Reichstag Fire.

So What Do We Do About This?

The only thing we have in our armoury is…

Join hundreds of paid heretics to get full articles, or get a free trial to read to the end of this one!